I am not posting because I am worried about what I post. Apparently, two posts of mine cost my husband new jobs with two different companies. One post because the recruiter was rabidly anti-military and I mentioned Alyssa was now in the US Army. Another job was killed because I mentioned my health problems. I figured out what happened both times because though the HR people were smart enough to use Google to look up my husband, they weren't smart enough to cover their tracks.
So I have been wondering what in Hell is possible to post without alarming people.
I am pleased, in my old computer tech way, that people have finally taken so well to the medium. It used to be just the geeks and nerds who liked computers. (BTW, I was one of the sorority girl extras in "Revenge of the Nerds"; pretty weird actually--since I was probably one of the geekiest people on that whole set.)
So the few things I have posted lately have been really, REALLY bland. And my posts don't mention Ronald, except in passing.
So should a person relate the truth about their personal lives on the internet? A young man was killed recently because he wanted to express the truth on the internet instead of lies. Lies seem safest, but very unsatisfying. The internet has always been a place where I could vent.
I like my internal world well ordered; truth here, fiction there. I worry that my medications may make the two intermix in ways I can't control. John D. McDonald once wrote that everyone has the inner fear they are personally crazy, and only the insane believe they are sane.
But what is a person who doesn't know what to believe, one way or the other?


