Someone at AOL is showing their liberal bias; look at the difference between these two screengrab headlines (slightly highlighted for easier reference):

Compared to this:

The first one says the GOP wants to "trash" the vote recount.  Very negative connotation.  The story it links to makes no mention of anyone asking for the vote recount to be "trashed".  Someone also decided this was going to show up under Crime News.  So the GOP asking for another vote recount to be stopped is a crime?  The first one went through, at a large cost to taxpayers, but asking for the second to be done is a crime?

So who did this?  Who knows.  Maybe the author of the story actually had the link title on his story, and an editor on the story end changed it to something less inflammatory.  Maybe an editor on the AOL side thought the author was being too easy on the GOP and wanted to spice things up.  Either way, it is pretty gross evidence of liberal bias.

For the full screens, go to AOL Screen Grabs and click on the thumbnails.

UPDATE: Apparently, I wasn't the only person who was ticked.  Someone caught the title and changed it into something a little less nasty:

So now "trash" has become "toss". (Both show up, the less nasty one is a few hours newer.) Kinder and gentler liberal bias...however, the request to stop the second recount is still under Crime News.  (So does this editor just consider the GOP to be a crime in progress, or what?)

Like the other two, the full page of the screengrab can be found under AOL Screen Grabs.